Suzors slice of cyber space

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

Dogme

Dogme 95 (in English: Dogma 95) is an avant-garde filmmaking movement started in 1995 by the Danish directors Lars von Trier, Thomas Vinterberg, Kristian Levring, and Søren Kragh-Jacobsen. This movement is sometimes known as the Dogme 95 Collective or the Dogme Brethren.

Background
The Dogme movement was announced on 22 March 1995 at Le cinéma vers son deuxième siècle conference in Paris, where the cinema world’s elite gathered to celebrate the first century of motion pictures and contemplate the uncertain future of commercial cinema. Lars von Trier was called upon to speak about the future of film but instead showered a bemused audience with red pamphlets announcing the Dogme 95 movement.

Goals and Rules
The goal of the Dogme collective is to purify filmmaking by refusing expensive and spectacular special effects, postproduction modifications and other gimmicks. The emphasis on purity forces the filmmakers to focus on the actual story and on the actors' performances. The audience may also be more engaged as they do not have overproduction to alienate them from the narrative, themes and mood. To this end, Lars von Trier and Thomas Vinterberg produced ten rules that any Dogme film must conform to. These rules, referred to as the Vow of Chastity, are as follows:

1. Filming must be done on location. Props and sets must not be brought in (if a particular prop is necessary for the story, a location must be chosen where this prop is to be found).

2.The sound must never be produced apart from the images or vice versa. (Music must not be used unless it occurs where the scene is being filmed).

3.The camera must be hand-held. Any movement or immobility attainable in the hand is permitted. (The film must not take place where the camera is standing; filming must take place where the action takes place.)

4.The film must be in colour. Special lighting is not acceptable. (If there is too little light for exposure the scene must be cut or a single lamp be attached to the camera).

5.Optical work and filters are forbidden.

6.The film must not contain superficial action. (Murders, weapons, etc. must not occur.)

7.Temporal and geographical alienation are forbidden. (That is to say that the film takes place here and now.)

8.Genre movies are not acceptable.

9.The final picture must be transferred to the Academy 35mm film, with an aspect ration of 4:3, that is, not widescreen. (Originally, the requirement was that the film had to be filmed on Academy 35mm film, but the rule was relaxed to allow low-budget productions.)

10.The director must not be credited.

These rules have been both circumvented and broken, from the first Dogme film. For instance, Thomas Vinterberg "confessed" to having covered a window during the shooting of one scene in The Celebration (Festen), which is both bringing a prop onto the set and using special lighting. There is no verification process to make a film a Dogme 95 film. Filmmakers submit a form online and check a box which states they "truly believe that the film ... has obeyed all Dogme95 rules as stated in the Vow of Chastity". As mentioned on the Dogme 95 website, it's up to the director of the movie to interpret the rules.
In certain cases, the titles of Dogme films are superfluous, since they are also referred to by numbers. The spirit of the Dogme technique influenced Lars von Trier's filmBreaking the Waves, although it is not a Dogme film. The first of the Dogme films was Vinterberg's 1998 film Festen, which is also known as Dogme #1. Festen was highly acclaimed by many critics, and won the Jury Prize at the Cannes Film Festival that year. Von Trier's only Dogme film, Idioterne(The Idiots, or Dogme #2), was less successful. Since those two original films were released, other directors have participated in the creation of Dogme films. For example, the American director Harmony Korine created the movie Julien Donkey-Boy which is also known as Dogme

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Storyboarding.

The movie Memento was one that I have seen before. I didn’t enjoy it then and I didn’t really enjoy it now. However, I did appreciate it more this time when I thought about all there is to write a script and produce a movie.

Character: Guy Pearce is a man who has almost no short term memory. His condition is soon explained in side the story and basically spells out why the story seems so jumpy. The jumpiness of the film gives an insight into the chaotic world of the character. While we realise that he has been through this before, the viewer realises that Guy doesn’t remember anything from anywhere from meetings to friends. It is shown to the viewer that the character is quite clever and organised with the use of photos as reminders to him to remember certain things.

Development: The movie essentially takes place backwards which poses problems in its own right. The first scene was that of teddy being shot in the head. In the conventional sense, this movie is about a man on a mission of vengeance to avenge his wife’s rape and murder. The normal storyline would have finding the body, investigating for clues, tracking down the character and then a final show down. This movie basically goes in the complete opposite direction. The realisation of who killed Guy’s wife is shown at the start and the main developments seem to be how he found out that Teddy was the murderer.

Setting: The movie seems to take place in an average run down town in not the best of neighbourhoods. The movie takes place in very few places and these places are constantly revisited. The motel and clothes of the characters portray them as average people. The cafeteria and motel seem deserted and the impression is given that the movie takes place in the middle of nowhere.

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

Screen Writing

Script is that of “The Cable Guy” (attached)

http://www.script-o-rama.com/snazzy/dircut.html

Characters: The character of Stephen is portrayed as a broken hearted softy who is having trouble dealing with the break up from his girlfriend. By his actions of viewing the picture of his ex and the way he talks to his frien Rick, the viewer gets the sense that Stephen is a bit weak willed. this trait of his personality is later taken advantage of by the cable guy. The cable guy is portrayed through out the movie from start to finish as a cooky, sort of crazy in a funny wierd way from the way he talks to his sense of humour to his military style haircut. His attitude seems so positive and his outlook on life is extremely optimistic. Hints of loneliness are shown when he offers to take Stephen out to the satelite.

Setting: The setting of the movie is largely the common streets of any city. The apartment that the first scenes are in show nothing out of the ordinary and stephens life seems normal. This can give the viewer the idea that this could happen to anyone. The boxes all across the floor show that Stephen has got other things on his mind so he doesnt really realise that a freak has just walked into his home which in turn results in an awkward and unwanted rtelationship

Direction: The first direction many viewers would think of is that of a love story as in the first few minutes, the ex-girlfriend is mentioned several times. this might be a logical way of thinking had the title of the film not been 'The Cable Guy.' It is then established to the viewer the wierdness of the cable guy and that there is something not quite right with him. The staliking of Stephen becomes clearer and the plot is quickly diverted to the blossoming relationship


Tuesday, August 08, 2006

Visualisation and Conceptualisation

Visualisation and Conceptualisation.

We learnt today about how to visualise a potential film plot today and that no idea should be left to forget. Also had the importance of essentials in a film like good character development, plots, location and props drilled into us. Also learnt that the power of imagination can expand on previous ideas which allow more room for artistic movement. Mainly learnt about the plot basics and the plot structures. The plot basics being the lead character who people need to be identified with, a problem that is unique to the character, their attempts to overcome these problems, the crisis and the inevitable resolution. The plot structures are:

Coming of Age

Spiderman - http://spiderman.sonypictures.com/index.php
Footy Legends - http://www.footylegends.com/
15/Love - http://www.15love.tv/

Redemption

V for Vendetta - http://vforvendetta.warnerbros.com/
Superman Returns - http://supermanreturns.warnerbros.com/
Batman Begins - http://www2.warnerbros.com/batmanbegins/index.html

Punitive

Passion of the Christ - http://www.thepassionofthechrist.com/splash.htm
Lord of War - http://www.lordofwarthemovie.com/
Kill Bill Volume 3 - http://killbill.movies.go.com/

Test

Click - http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/click/
Star Wars – www.starwars.com
Pirates of the Caribbean: The curse of the Black Pearl - http://disney.go.com/disneypictures/pirates/

Education

American History X - http://www.historyx.com/
Legally Blonde - http://www.legallyblonde2.com/
Daddy Day Care - http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/daddydaycare/site/

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

The second week of university started off really well. Learnt the basics of the processes that go into making a film and that being the executive producer is the most unenviable position in the crew there is and that being an associate producer is not the high profile job that the name suggests. It was interesting to see just how many people go into the making of a film and why it is that it can take years of hard work for the final movie to make it to the big screen or even if it goes straight to DVD.

I also learnt that independent films can tell just as important a message as the big budgeted Hollywood feature films and that big production companies are in the film making industry for the money and therefore run their productions purely to make money rather than to put out a simply great film.

Got to watch an interesting tit bit of an independent flick called "BRICK". Very interesting and slightly odd in the way the characters interact and talk to one another. What I did like about the film was the real feel of the start and the intrigue that is created in the first twenty minutes that makes me want to know just who did kill this mysterious Emily character.